[ecoop-info] ICST - CALL FOR PAPERS - SECOVAL 2007

info at icstconferences.org info at icstconferences.org
Tue Apr 17 14:15:03 CEST 2007


The 3RD Annual Workshop on the Value of Security through Collaboration
in cooperation with IEEE/CREATE-NET SECURECOMM '07

Aims and scope of SECOVAL: 

Security is usually centrally managed, for example in the form of
policies duly executed by individual nodes. The SECOVAL workshop
covers the alternative trend of using collaboration and trust to
provide security. Instead of centrally managed security policies,
nodes may use specific knowledge (both local and acquired from other
nodes) to make security-related decisions. For example, in
reputation-based schemes, the reputation of a given node (and hence
its security access rights) can be determined based on the
recommendations of peer nodes. As systems are being deployed on
ever-greater scale without direct connection to their distant home
base, the need for self-management is rapidly increasing. Interaction
after interaction, as the nodes collaborate, there is the emergence of
a digital ecosystem. By guiding the local decisions of the nodes, for
example, with whom the nodes collaborate, global properties of the
ecosystem where the nodes operate may be guaranteed. Thus, the
security property of the ecosystem may be driven by self-organizing
mechanisms. Depending on which local collaboration is preferred, a
more trustworthy ecosystem may emerge.

This year SECOVAL is focusing upon a special research subtopic within
the scope of collaborative security, namely, Privacy and Data
Sanitization. Any useful collaboration is at some point sharing
data. Unfortunately, data sharing is one of the greatest hurdles
getting in the way of otherwise beneficial collaborations. Data
regarding one's security stance is particularly sensitive, often
indicating ones own security weaknesses. This data could include
computer or network logs of security incidents, architecture
documents, or sensitive organizational information. Even when the data
may not compromise the data owner's security stance, sharing may
violate a customer's privacy. Data sanitization techniques such as
anonymization and other mechanisms such as privacy-preserving data
mining and statistical data mining try to address this tension between
the need to share information and protect sensitive information and
user privacy.

While papers will be considered that address any of the topics of
security through collaboration from previous years (e.g., benefits
from collaboration, methods of creating or measuring trust,
self-organizing coalitions and risk analysis), the focus of the
workshop will be around privacy and data sanitization. This topic is
further divided into three main areas, each answering the related
research questions. Contributions addressing at least one of these
areas are more likely to be accepted.

1. What are the fundamental issues that need to be addressed in the
   areas of data sanitization and anonymization? What problems must be
   solved to make current tools more effective and sharing more
   wide-spread? One thing fundamentally missing from this area are
   metrics to help evaluate the trade-off between information loss and
   security/privacy. Metrics are needed to measure information loss,
   and they are needed to measure the utility of the computer log or
   data source after anonymization. A classification of the types of
   attacks on anonymization schemes and a formal adversarial model is
   lacking. Such a threat model would help to develop metrics of the
   security provided by an anonymization scheme. Are there other basic
   anonymization algorithms needed for special types of data? One of
   the last new algorithms developed was prefix-preserving
   anonymization for IP addresses. Sometimes anonymization needs to be
   reversed once a problem has been found. How can this be done and
   when is it practical? Finally, data injection attacks (e.g., an
   adversary can inject events into a system knowing they will appear
   in a later public release of anonymized data) are particularly to
   difficult to protect against. What methods can be used to mitigate
   such attacks on anonymization systems.

2. What are the practical problems that have yet to be addressed by
   current anonymization systems? What new tools and frameworks exist
   for the task? What are the economic implications of data
   sanitization and preserving privacy? What are the legal issues
   involved in protecting privacy, and how do they differ by
   geo-political areas? How can anonymization utilities be made more
   usable by a wider audience, and who are the potential consumers?
   Interesting case studies of implementations of anonymization and
   privacy enhancing technologies will be considered. Of particular
   interest are case studies by industry of how they have addressed
   these hurdles to data sharing. How can effective policies be
   created and negotiated? Do we need a common anonymization policy
   language, and what would we need in such a language? How can we
   identify sensitive information especially in the context of
   multiple data sources? What are some best practice guidelines that
   one can follow before releasing or sharing sensitive data? Finally
   special issues surrounding real-time anonymization and anonymity in
   Peer-to-Peer systems is of interest.

3. What privacy and data sanitization issues are specific to data
   bases and data mining? This would include traditional topics on
   privacy-preserving data mining and statistical databases. It would
   also include topics on inference attacks and data aggregation. Much
   of the research in this area has focused on privacy preserving
   transformations that would minimally alter traditional data mining
   functions (e.g., link analysis and clustering). Submissions
   focusing on less traditional data mining functions are especially
   encouraged. Another problem with anonymization is data mining
   across sets anonymized by different parties in different ways. New
   methods should be created for collaborative anonymization that
   makes mappings consistent between contributing parties but
   irreversible to all.

Topics of interest to the workshop include, but are not limited to:

* Legal aspects of privacy and anonymization
* Economic issues of privacy enhancing tech
* Data sanitizing and privacy enhancing tools
* Data sharing and anonymization case studies
* Real-time anonymization issues
* Anonymization policy creation & negotiation
* Data sharing & sanitizing best practices
* Anonymity in Peer-to-Peer networks
* Classification of attacks against anonymization
* Metrics of utility, anonymization strength and information loss
* Anonymization / privacy-preserving algorithms
* Data injection and inference attacks
* Identification of sensitive fields and data
* Privacy-preserving Data Mining
* Statistical databases and protection of sensitive information
* Data mining multiple anonymized data sources
* Consistent pseudonym mappings in multi-party anonymization
* Identification of data sources and types useful to share for
  collaborative computer security 
* Insights from industry and case studies
* Usability issues of current anonymization tools

We welcome submissions from industry and are contemplating a special
industry track. Whether we dedicate an entire track to this depends
upon responses in this area, of course.

Submission Details: 
Submission guidelines are posted on the SECOVAL
2007 website (http://www.trustcomp.org/secoval/), which always
contains the latest updates:

Authors are invited to submit papers formatted according to IEEE
conference style 2-column (from a 2-page extended abstract to 10 pages
limit).  Paper submissions should be sent via the online management
system available at http://www.trustcomp.org/secoval/.  Submissions
will be accepted until 23:59 GMT, May 18, 2007.

Important Dates:
May 31, 2007: Expression of interest to participate to the workshop
and submit a paper. 

June 3, 2007: Paper submissions (until 23:59 GMT).

June 24, 2007: Author notification.

July 22, 2007: Camera-ready copy according to IEEE conference style
2-column proceedings. 

Sep. 17, 2007: SECURECOMM in Nice, France

End of 2007: Preparation of the Journal special issue.

Workshop Co-chairs:
Adam Slagell		NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Kiran Lakkaraju		NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
J.M. Seigneur		University of Geneva, Switzerland
Stephen Marsh		National Research Council of Canada

Program Committee:
Adam Slagell		NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Ayman Kayssi		University of Beirut, Lebanon
Bill Yurcik		Army Research Lab at Aberdeen Proving Grounds, USA
Daniele Quercia		University College London, UK
Dieter Sommer		IBM Research, Switzerland.
Giannis F. Marias	University of Athens, Greece
Himanshu Khurana	NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Jim Basney		NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
J.M. Seigneur		University of Geneva, Switzerland
Joerg Abendroth		Nokia Siemens Networks, Germany
Kiran Lakkaraju		NCSA, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Konrad Wrona		SAP Research, France
Lalana Kagal		Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Licia Capra		University College London, UK
Michael Kinateder	SAP, Germany
Nikita Borisov		University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Noria Foukia		University of Otago, New Zealand
Pierpaolo Dondio	Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
Piotr Cofta		British Telecom, UK.
Richard Anthony		University of Greenwich, UK
Ron Dodge		United States Military Academy, USA
Simson Garfinkel	Naval Post Graduate School, USA
Sini Ruohomaa		University of Helsinki, Finland
Stephen Marsh		National Research Council of Canada
Victor S. Grishchenko	Ural State University, Russia
Zoran Despotovic	DoCoMo Communications Laboratories Europe, Germany

For more information please visit: http://www.trustcomp.org/secoval/
or send an email to secoval at trustcomp.org.  




--------------------------------------------------
You are reading ICST conference newsletter. To report any kind of abuse, please contact admin at icst.org.
To unsubscribe, please visit the following page: http://icstconferences.org/unsubscribe.php?p=htzqgjovll and enter your email address.


More information about the ecoop-info mailing list